Supreme Court has ruled against 43 MPs seeking for pension money
Supreme Court has ruled against 43 retired Members of Parliament (MPs) who are fighting for a constitutional pension scheme for MPs in the country.
The court said retired MPs do not have any constitutional right to receive pension.
Rather, the court held that retired MPs are entitled to gratuities (which the court described as lump sum payments) as stipulated in Article 114 of the 1992 constitution, reports.
In a unanimous decision on Thursday, December 3, 2020, a seven member panel of the apex court held that the Chinnery-Hesse Committee which recommended the payment of pensions to MPs who retired from 2005-2008 acted unconstitutionally.
“By the combined reading of Article 71(3), 98(1) and Article 114 of the 1992 Constitution, the Chinnery-Hesse Committee acted unconstitutionally,” the court held.
The decision of the apex court which was read by Justice Sule Gbadegbe, as his valedictory judgement, was in relation to a constitutional reference made by the Court of Appeal to the apex court.
The Court of Appeal is currently hearing an appeal by 43 former retired MPs who are fighting for the payment of pension in line with the Chinnery-Hesse’s recommendation.
In 2017, the former MPs sued the government at the High Court for GH₵233,495 each, being their accrued monthly pension pay.
The basis of the legal action by the 43 former MPs was the Chinnery-Hesse Presidential Emoluments Committee (PEC) which provides that parliamentarians who were 50 years and above and exited Parliament, having served two full terms, should be paid some sums of money as pension benefits.
Some notable names among the former MPs who initiated the legal action are Mr Yaw Osafo-Maafo, Dr Kofi Konadu Apraku, Dr Kwame Ampofo, Mr Kwamina Bartels, Mr Freddie Blay, Mr Kenneth Dzirasah, Ms Christine Churcher, Mr Isaac E. Edumadze (deceased) and Mr Nkrabea Effah-Darteh, Mr David Apesera and Mr S.K Boafo.
The former MPs lost a suit at the High Court and appealed at the Court of Appeal.
The Court of Appeal decided to make a constitutional reference to the Supreme Court to decide whether or not per the 1992 Constitution, retired MPs were entitled to pension.