EIB Network threatens to take action over purported video of Serwaa Amihere
Management of EIB Network, owners of GHOne TV has threatened to crack the whip against culprits when the need arises as it has commenced an independent investigation into the viral video purported to be one of its employees, Serwaa Amihere.
According to the media network, management delayed public comments since there were other investigations on going on the matter but now the company was keen on investigating the circumstances surrounding the release of the said video, and that measures would be taken thereafter.
In a statement released on Wednesday, April 10, the media company stated that it has become aware of the criminal proceedings instituted by the State against certain persons who were alleged to have published the said video of Serwaa Amihere.
“The Company will accordingly publish the findings of the independent investigation as soon as same is completed and further measures will be taken thereafter,” the statement said.
This comes after a video that showed the embattled broadcaster in bed with a man, identified as Henry Fitz, went viral on social media a few days ago.
Online speculations suggested that the video was shot in 2019, after Henry Fitz got married and Serwaa Amihere became the MC of the occasion.
It was disclosed that Serwaa Amihere established contact with the groom during the big occasion and thereafter, began her bedroom encounters with him.
Meanwhile, the Ghana Police Service has filed charges against three persons accused of sharing the intimate video of the broadcast journalist.
The individuals identified by the law enforcement agency are Edem Saviour Ketti, a filmmaker; Candylove Kwakyewaa Ababio, a trader; and Henry Amponsah, popularly known as Henry Fitz.
The trio faced four counts of charges related to sëxuãl extortion and the intentional distribution of an intimate visual recording of Serwaa Amihere.
Some of the charges included conspiracy to commit a crime namely non-consensual sharing of intimate images contrary to Section 23 (1) of the Criminal Offenses Act 1960, and the Cyber Security Act 2020 on non-consensual sharing of intimate images.
They have also been accused of sëxuãl extortion contrary to Section 66(1) of the Cyber Security Act 2020.
Source: www.spotonnews.net
